Author Topic: Friend told me to remove Facebook photo as it depicts us not socially distancing  (Read 1237 times)

gellchom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 856
  • Location: Tel Aviv, Israel (Formerly Ohio, US)
    • View Profile

  • Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary Level 5 Fourth year Anniversary
That kind of thing, especially from community leaders, leads others to think that the precautions aren't really that important -- after all, if they're going out for ice cream, I guess I can go to a restaurant/salon/gym ...


If the local recommendations allow for people to go for ice cream, or to a restaurant, salon, gym or ____, then there is nothing wrong with people engaging in those activities. An individual can choose to not engage in such activities, or can decide to not be around other people for whatever reason, but I think it is unfair to act as though people doing what the guidelines allow are somehow "bad."

I didn’t say (or think) that they were “bad.”  I don’t think that’s a fair characterization of my post.

The recommendations at that time were to stay home except for essential reasons.  There were not legal prohibitions, though, so I guess you could say going for ice cream was “allowed.”

But that doesn’t make it good practice or responsible.  Coughing out into the air is “allowed,” too, as are plenty of things that are much more inconsiderate, selfish, dangerous, and irresponsible than making nonessential outings.

Anyway, as I thought I made clear in my post, I don’t think they did anything wrong in going for that ice cream. Sometimes you just have to make an exception.  I do, too.  I just thought they shouldn’t have made a point of advertising it. Which is kind of what I think about the OP’s story.  It’s not anything awful or “bad,” but it’s not what I think we should be modeling and encouraging, either. 



Disagree Disagree x 1 View List

oogyda

That kind of thing, especially from community leaders, leads others to think that the precautions aren't really that important -- after all, if they're going out for ice cream, I guess I can go to a restaurant/salon/gym ...


If the local recommendations allow for people to go for ice cream, or to a restaurant, salon, gym or ____, then there is nothing wrong with people engaging in those activities. An individual can choose to not engage in such activities, or can decide to not be around other people for whatever reason, but I think it is unfair to act as though people doing what the guidelines allow are somehow "bad."

I didn’t say (or think) that they were “bad.”  I don’t think that’s a fair characterization of my post.

The recommendations at that time were to stay home except for essential reasons.  There were not legal prohibitions, though, so I guess you could say going for ice cream was “allowed.”

But that doesn’t make it good practice or responsible.  Coughing out into the air is “allowed,” too, as are plenty of things that are much more inconsiderate, selfish, dangerous, and irresponsible than making nonessential outings.

Anyway, as I thought I made clear in my post, I don’t think they did anything wrong in going for that ice cream. Sometimes you just have to make an exception.  I do, too.  I just thought they shouldn’t have made a point of advertising it. Which is kind of what I think about the OP’s story.  It’s not anything awful or “bad,” but it’s not what I think we should be modeling and encouraging, either.

I disagree with the bolded.  Just because it wasn't illegal, does not mean it was "allowed".....at all. 

And I do think what that family did was "bad".  Going for ice cream is not essential.  And it certainly didn't take all of them to get the ice cream especially since only dad went in the shop.  And more especially since they took it home to eat!

« Last Edit: August 07, 2020, 09:23:09 am by oogyda »
Disagree Disagree x 2 View List

LifeOnPluto

I also don't find her text terse at all. She said please and explained why she was asking. Curious how you would have preferred her to make her request.

Fair question. I guess if I were in Barbara's shoes, I'd at least try to acknowledge the inconvenience to the photo-owner, and own my part for not speaking up in the moment. I'd probably say something like "Hey, I'm sorry to do this, as I know you're a big fan of [Star Trek], but would you mind removing the photo of us by [Landmark]? I should have said something at the time, but on reflection I'm just a bit concerned that it shows us not social distancing."

She may also have been quite comfortable with the lack of distance, given the cases in your city, and given what she knows about your habits.

She may have just not wanted to face snarky backlash from people who didn't have the background info she did, and who were looking to be judgmental.

This is a fair point too, but in that case, I wish she'd simply untagged herself. My Facebook privacy settings are set to the highest level, and the number of mutual Facebook friends we have is very low (ie you can count on one hand). If she'd untagged herself, none of her own Facebook friends would have been able to see it. I suspect the chances of anyone else identifying Barbara (let alone going out of their way to criticise her) were fairly minimal (but obviously, you never know, which is why I took it down!).

TootsNYC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • Location: formerly small-town Midwest, NYC as an adult
    • View Profile

  • Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary Fourth year Anniversary Level 4
untagging is still not a guarantee

oogyda

Edit the photo to blur her face or somehow crop her out.  This  seems to be is important to you to have a photo by this thing and I get why you'd want to show it off a little. 

I won't assign ill will to Barbara.  I'm assuming she was perfectly comfortable with the distance in the moment, but realized she could be deeply criticized for it later.  It's too bad nobody thought of getting a photo of just you with it.

oogyda

Or you could set your privacy on that post to "Friends except".  That will give you a drop down of all your friends and you would click on the button next to her name. 

After you blur out her face.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

gramma dishes

Or you could set your privacy on that post to "Friends except".  That will give you a drop down of all your friends and you would click on the button next to her name. 

After you blur out her face.

That would stop Barbara from being able to see it, but her objection was that other people would see it and "other people" still would and might say something to the effect of "Hey!  I saw the two of you really close together at such-and-such monument and not only were you standing close together, you weren't even wearing masks!  What's up with that?"  And that's what she's trying to avoid.

oogyda

Or you could set your privacy on that post to "Friends except".  That will give you a drop down of all your friends and you would click on the button next to her name. 

After you blur out her face.

That would stop Barbara from being able to see it, but her objection was that other people would see it and "other people" still would and might say something to the effect of "Hey!  I saw the two of you really close together at such-and-such monument and not only were you standing close together, you weren't even wearing masks!  What's up with that?"  And that's what she's trying to avoid.

You're right.  But, OP said they have very few mutual fb friends, so she could include them in the "Friends except".

Nikko-chan

Frankly, I would untag her. And then I would keep the photo up. Why? Because she is the one that decided to be in the photo with you. 'We can't let OP be in the photo by herself!" Followed by her bouncing into the photo next to you. If she hadn't done that, you wouldn't be having this issue.

Am I the only one who feels Barbara was trying to start trouble? She had to know OP would have posted the photo on social media.
Agree Agree x 1 Disagree Disagree x 1 View List

Hmmm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2805
  • Location: Texas - USA
    • View Profile

  • Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary 2500 Posts Level 5
No, I don't think she was trying to cause trouble. Do you not feel that people should have the opportunity to reflect on their actions an then make a different decision? I'm not following why you'd put a bad spin on her behavior.

Barbara's first inclination was to join in the photo to create more of a festive image of two friends out. Later she realizes the image gives a bad impression of the afternoon. 

I personally think it is fair to allow our friends to take a step back and say "You know, that might not have been the best action. Let's not advertise this to our social groups."

What if we turned this around and it was Barbara coming and saying that she and a couple of friends spent the day out and hadn't followed good guidelines and she now regrets those actions. She's asked her friend to remove a photo on social media of them but knows the friend is really excited about being able to show a photo of her next to a landmark. Her friend is balking because she is prioritizing wanting to show her fun photo over being perceived negatively by their social group.  Is she in the wrong to ask for a photo that she is in to be taken down?

Agree Agree x 3 View List